4.6 Article

Design and In Situ Synthesis of Titanium Carbide/Boron Nitride Nanocomposite: Investigation of Electrocatalytic Activity for the Sulfadiazine Sensor

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 33, 页码 12471-12481

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03281

关键词

MXenes; inorganic materials; antibiotics; biological samples

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 107-2221-E-027-079-MY3]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials are considered a rising star in diverse electrochemical technologies due to their special characteristics. We report here the design and synthesis of 2D titanium carbide/boron nitride nanocomposite via the sonochemical method. The successfully produced TiC/BN nanocomposites were characterized by in-depth electron microscopic and spectroscopic methods and served as an electrocatalyst for the determination of sulfadiazine (SFZ). The good electrocatalytic activity toward SFZ sensing with strong durability and good stability can be achieved by the TiC/BN-modified electrode. The unique structural characteristic of the TiC/BN electrocatalyst is in favor of accommodating more surface sites, improved conductivity, promoted charge-transfer ability, and enhanced surface area. For the proof of the above concept, the TiC/BN-modified electrode was characterized with low charge-transfer resistance (R-ct = 20 Omega), good peak potential separation (Delta E-p = 0.080 V), and good active surface area (A = 0.106 cm(2)). According to the measurement results of electrochemical response toward SFZ, the TiC/BN-modified electrode shows a trace-level limit of detection (3.0 nM), a large working range (0.01-44; 59-186 mu M), good sensitivity (1.47 mu A mu M-1 cm(2)), high selectivity and good reproducibility (4.11%). The proposed electrochemical sensor possesses good detection performance in monitoring human urine samples. The obtained results would shed light on the applications of clectrocatalyst in electrochemical sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据