4.6 Article

Hierarchical Co,Fe-MOF-74/Co/Carbon Cloth Hybrid Electrode: Simple Construction and Enhanced Catalytic Performance in Full Water Splitting

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 32, 页码 12025-12035

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c02993

关键词

MOFs; Electrocatalyst; Electrodeposition; OER; HER; Synergistic effect

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571005]
  2. Recruitment Program for Leading Talent Team of Anhui Province
  3. Research Culture Funds of Anhui Normal University [2018XJJ92]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have attracted much interest in electrocatalysis as promising catalysts in recent years. However, it still remains a challenge to directly use MOF-based materials as bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. Herein, a hierarchical Co,Fe-MOF-74/Co/carbon cloth (CC) three-layer hybrid electrode is synthesized by a simple electrochemical deposition technology with subsequent solvothermal treatment. Electrochemical performance investigations show that the asconstructed Co,Fe-MOF-74/Co/CC electrode exhibits impressive electrocatalytic activity for full water splitting, which only requires a low overpotential of 226 mV@20 mA cm(-2) for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and 94 mV@-10 mA cm(-2) for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), respectively. Employing the as-constructed electrode as the anode and cathode in a two-electrode setup simultaneously, only 1.65 V of the voltage is needed to deliver the current density of 20 mA cm(-2). The above excellent electrochemical performances should be attributed to the specific architecture, the synergistic effect of the Co and Fe species, and the superhydrophilic surface of the catalyst. More importantly, further investigations uncover that metal hydroxides and oxyhydroxides produced in situ during electrochemical tests are the veritable active species, which promote the high catalytic activity of the present catalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据