4.6 Article

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated introduction of the sodium/iodide symporter gene enables noninvasive in vivo tracking of induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes

期刊

STEM CELLS TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 10, 页码 1203-1217

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/sctm.20-0019

关键词

cardiomyocytes; CRISPR; Cas9; electrophysiology; imaging; in vivo tracking; iPSCs; NIS; PET; rhesus macaque; sodium iodide symporter

资金

  1. Medical Research Scholars Program of the NIH
  2. Division of Intramural Research program of the NHLBI
  3. NCI
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [ZICHL006145, ZIAHL002338, ZIAHL006062] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Techniques that enable longitudinal tracking of cell fate after myocardial delivery are imperative for optimizing the efficacy of cell-based cardiac therapies. However, these approaches have been underutilized in preclinical models and clinical trials, and there is considerable demand for site-specific strategies achieving long-term expression of reporter genes compatible with safe noninvasive imaging. In this study, the rhesus sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) gene was incorporated into rhesus macaque induced pluripotent stem cells (RhiPSCs) via CRISPR/Cas9. Cardiomyocytes derived from NIS-RhiPSCs (NIS-RhiPSC-CMs) exhibited overall similar morphological and electrophysiological characteristics compared to parental control RhiPSC-CMs at baseline and with exposure to physiological levels of sodium iodide. Mice were injected intramyocardially with 2 million NIS-RhiPSC-CMs immediately following myocardial infarction, and serial positron emission tomography/computed tomography was performed with(18)F-tetrafluoroborate to monitor transplanted cells in vivo. NIS-RhiPSC-CMs could be detected until study conclusion at 8 to 10 weeks postinjection. This NIS-based molecular imaging platform, with optimal safety and sensitivity characteristics, is primed for translation into large-animal preclinical models and clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据