4.7 Article

Building Extraction of Aerial Images by a Global and Multi-Scale Encoder-Decoder Network

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 12, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs12152350

关键词

building extraction; aerial image; encoder-decoder network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61801351, 61802190, 61772400]
  2. Key Laboratory of National Defense Science and Technology Foundation Project [6142113180302]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620441]
  4. Xidian University New Teacher Innovation Fund [XJS18032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Semantic segmentation is an important and challenging task in the aerial image community since it can extract the target level information for understanding the aerial image. As a practical application of aerial image semantic segmentation, building extraction always attracts researchers' attention as the building is the specific land cover in the aerial images. There are two key points for building extraction from aerial images. One is learning the global and local features to fully describe the buildings with diverse shapes. The other one is mining the multi-scale information to discover the buildings with different resolutions. Taking these two key points into account, we propose a new method named global multi-scale encoder-decoder network (GMEDN) in this paper. Based on the encoder-decoder framework, GMEDN is developed with a local and global encoder and a distilling decoder. The local and global encoder aims at learning the representative features from the aerial images for describing the buildings, while the distilling decoder focuses on exploring the multi-scale information for the final segmentation masks. Combining them together, the building extraction is accomplished in an end-to-end manner. The effectiveness of our method is validated by the experiments counted on two public aerial image datasets. Compared with some existing methods, our model can achieve better performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据