4.2 Article

Health literacy and diabetes self-care in individuals with type 2 diabetes in Turkey

期刊

PRIMARY CARE DIABETES
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 74-79

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.06.009

关键词

Type 2 diabetes; Health literacy; Diabetes self-care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study suggests that there is a relationship between health literacy and diabetes self-care in individuals with type 2 diabetes, with higher health literacy associated with better self-care. Factors such as education level, exercise status, and health literacy scores were found to be significantly related to diabetes self-care.
Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between health literacy and diabetes self-care in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 207 individuals with Type 2 diabetes at a diabetes outpatient clinic of a foundation university hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. The data were collected using a sociodemographic and illness characteristics questionnaire, the Turkish version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q-TR), and the Diabetes Self-Care Scale (DSCS). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, Student's t-test, Pearson correlation test, and multiple regression analysis. Results: It was found that 81.5% of individuals with type 2 diabetes were at an inadequate or limited and problematic level of health literacy. The DSCS mean scores of patients with an inadequate health literacy level were significantly lower than that of patients at other levels of health literacy. It was determined that education level, exercise status, and HLS-EU-Q-TR scores were significantly related to diabetes self-care (R-2 = 0.245, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study found that individuals with type 2 diabetes had higher diabetes self-care if they had a high education level, regularly exercised, or had high HLS-EU-Q-TR mean scores. (C) 2020 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据