4.7 Article

A Preliminary Evaluation of the Pro-Chondrogenic Potential of 3D-Bioprinted Poly(ester Urea) Scaffolds

期刊

POLYMERS
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/polym12071478

关键词

3D bioprinting; cartilage repair; tissue engineering; poly(ester urea); scaffold design

资金

  1. Henry Royce Institute for Advanced Materials through EPSRC [EP/R00661X/1, EP/S019367/1, EP/P025021/1, EP/P025498/1]
  2. University of Manchester
  3. EPSRC-MRC
  4. EPSRC [EP/P025021/1, EP/S019367/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [MR/L004992/1, MR/L023784/1, MR/L023784/2] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degeneration of articular cartilage (AC) is a common healthcare issue that can result in significantly impaired function and mobility for affected patients. The avascular nature of the tissue strongly burdens its regenerative capacity contributing to the development of more serious conditions such as osteoarthritis. Recent advances in bioprinting have prompted the development of alternative tissue engineering therapies for the generation of AC. Particular interest has been dedicated to scaffold-based strategies where 3D substrates are used to guide cellular function and tissue ingrowth. Despite its extensive use in bioprinting, the application of polycaprolactone (PCL) in AC is, however, restricted by properties that inhibit pro-chondrogenic cell phenotypes. This study proposes the use of a new bioprintable poly(ester urea) (PEU) material as an alternative to PCL for the generation of an in vitro model of early chondrogenesis. The polymer was successfully printed into 3D constructs displaying adequate substrate stiffness and increased hydrophilicity compared to PCL. Human chondrocytes cultured on the scaffolds exhibited higher cell viability and improved chondrogenic phenotype with upregulation of genes associated with type II collagen and aggrecan synthesis. Bioprinted PEU scaffolds could, therefore, provide a potential platform for the fabrication of bespoke, pro-chondrogenic tissue engineering constructs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据