4.6 Article

Unravelling the γ-butyrolactone network in Streptomyces coelicolor by computational ensemble modelling

期刊

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
卷 16, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008039

关键词

-

资金

  1. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/M000354/1, BB/M017702/1]
  2. H2020 TOPCAPI project, European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [720793]
  3. University of Manchester
  4. BBSRC [BB/M000354/1, BB/M017702/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. EPSRC [EP/S01778X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. NERC [NE/T010959/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibiotic production is coordinated in the Streptomyces coelicolor population through the use of diffusible signaling molecules of the gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) family. The GBL regulatory system involves a small, and not completely defined two-gene network which governs a potentially bi-stable switch between the on and off states of antibiotic production. The use of this circuit as a tool for synthetic biology has been hampered by a lack of mechanistic understanding of its functionality. We here present the creation and analysis of a versatile and adaptable ensemble model of the Streptomyces GBL system (detailed information on all model mechanisms and parameters is documented in http://www.systemsbiology.ls. manchester.ac.uk/wiki/index.php/Main_Page). We use the model to explore a range of previously proposed mechanistic hypotheses, including transcriptional interference, antisense RNA interactions between the mRNAs of the two genes, and various alternative regulatory activities. Our results suggest that transcriptional interference alone is not sufficient to explain the system's behavior. Instead, antisense RNA interactions seem to be the system's driving force, combined with an aggressive scbR promoter. The computational model can be used to further challenge and refine our understanding of the system's activity and guide future experimentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据