4.3 Article

Dietary inflammation and cardiometabolic health in adolescents

期刊

PEDIATRIC OBESITY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12706

关键词

blood pressure; dyslipidemia; hypertension; nutrition; obesity; pediatric

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that consuming a pro-inflammatory diet during adolescence was associated with changes in markers of albuminuria, lipids, and blood pressure. Specifically, in overweight adolescents, a pro-inflammatory diet was linked to albuminuria and dyslipidemia, while in obese adolescents, it was associated with higher systolic blood pressure and lower diastolic blood pressure.
Background The Children's Dietary Inflammatory Index (C-DII) has been validated to characterize the inflammatory potential of an individual child's diet. Objective To determine the association between C-DII and markers of cardiometabolic risk (adiposity, blood pressure [BP], lipids, albuminuria, glomerular hyperfiltration) in adolescents. Methods Participants aged 12-18 enrolled in NHANES from 2005 to 2014 who completed a 24-hour dietary recall were included in this cross-sectional study. Regression models adjusted for age, sex, race and height examined associations of C-DII quartiles stratified by weight status. Results Among adolescents (mean age 15 years), the average C-DII score was 0.86 (SE 0.04). When comparing C-DII quartile 4 (most pro-inflammatory) to quartile 1 (most anti-inflammatory), there was a positive association with albuminuria (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.02, 2.03). After stratifying by weight status, C-DII quartile was found to be significantly associated with albuminuria (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.83, 9.92) and dyslipidemia (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.15, 3.03) in adolescents who were overweight. Among adolescents with obesity, C-DII quartile was associated with higher SBP (beta= 5.07, 95% CI 2.55-7.59) and lower DBP (beta= -4.14, 95% CI -6.74, -1.54). Conclusion Consuming a pro-inflammatory diet in adolescence was associated with alterations in albuminuria, lipid and BP measures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据