4.6 Article

What Controls the Water Vapor Isotopic Composition Near the Surface of Tropical Oceans? Results From an Analytical Model Constrained by Large-Eddy Simulations

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020MS002106

关键词

water isotopes; convection; large-eddy simulation

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [805041]
  2. National Science Foundation [AGS-1938108]
  3. NASA [NNX13AN47G]
  4. NASA [467684, NNX13AN47G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [805041] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The goal of this study is to understand the mechanisms controlling the isotopic composition of the water vapor near the surface of tropical oceans, at the scale of about a hundred kilometers and a month. In the tropics, it has long been observed that the isotopic compositions of rain and vapor near the surface are more depleted when the precipitation rate is high. This is called the amount effect. Previous studies, based on observations or models with parameterized convection, have highlighted the roles of deep convective and mesoscale downdrafts and rain evaporation. But the relative importance of these processes has never been quantified. We hypothesize that it can be quantified using an analytical model constrained by large-eddy simulations. Results from large-eddy simulations confirm that the classical amount effect can be simulated only if precipitation rate changes result from changes in the large-scale circulation. We find that the main process depleting the water vapor compared to the equilibrium with the ocean is the fact that updrafts stem from areas where the water vapor is more enriched. The main process responsible for the amount effect is the fact that when the large-scale ascent increases, isotopic vertical gradients are steeper, so that updrafts and downdrafts deplete the subcloud layer more efficiently.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据