4.3 Article

Is BMI a Valid Indicator of Overweight and Obesity for Adolescents?

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134815

关键词

adolescents; overweight; obesity; body mass index; body fat proportion

资金

  1. Slovak Research and Development Support Agency [APVV-18-0070, APVV-17-0568]
  2. Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic
  3. Slovak Academy of Sciences [1/0427/17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Overweight and obesity are mostly monitored via the Body Mass Index (BMI), based on self-reported or measured height and weight. Previous studies have shown that BMI as a measure of obesity can introduce important misclassification problems. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of overweight and obesity classification based on self-reported and on measured height and weight versus the proportion of body fat as the criterion.Methods: We used data on 782 adolescents (mean age = 13.5, 55.8% boys) from the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study conducted in 2018 in Slovakia. We obtained self-reported (height and weight) and objective measures (height, weight) and the proportion of fat (as the criterion measure) measured via bioimpedance body composition analysis (BIA) with an InBody 230 from the adolescents.Results: Both measured and self-reported BMI indicated overweight and obesity with relatively low sensitivity (66-82%), but high specificity (90-92%). The superior accuracy of measured BMI in comparison to self-reported BMI was confirmed by the area under the curve (AUC) based on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves (AUC measured/self-reported: 0.94/0.89;p< 0.001). The misclassification of overweight and obesity was significantly higher when using self-reported BMI than when using measured BMI.Conclusion: Both self-reported and measured BMI as indicators of overweight and obesity underestimate the prevalence of adolescents with overweight and obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据