4.5 Article

Meiofauna promotes litter decomposition in stream ecosystems depending on leaf species

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 10, 期 17, 页码 9257-9270

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6610

关键词

litter decomposition process; macrofauna; meiofauna; microbes; trophic complexity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901147]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019CDXYCH0026, 2017CDJXY210008, 2019CDQYCH014]
  3. Venture & Innovation Support Program for Chongqing Overseas Returnees [CX2017120]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Litter decomposition, a fundamental process of nutrient cycling and energy flow in freshwater ecosystems, is driven by a diverse array of decomposers. As an important component of the heterotrophic food web, meiofauna can provide a trophic link between leaf-associated microbes (i.e., bacteria and fungi)/plant detritus and macroinvertebrates, though their contribution to litter decomposition is not well understood. To investigate the role of different decomposer communities in litter decomposition, especially meiofauna, we compared the litter decomposition of three leaf species with different lignin to nitrogen ratios in litter bags with different mesh sizes (0.05, 0.25, and 2 mm) in a forested stream, in China for 78 days. The meiofauna significantly enhanced the decomposition of leaves of high-and medium- quality, while decreasing (negative effect) or increasing (positive effect) the fungal biomass and diversity. Macrofauna and meiofauna together contributed to the decomposition of low-quality leaf species. The presence of meiofauna and macrofauna triggered different aspects of the microbial community, with their effects on litter decomposition varying as a function of leaf quality. This study reveals that the meiofauna increased the trophic complexity and modulated their interactions with microbes, highlighting the important yet underestimated role of meiofauna in detritus-based ecosystems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据