4.5 Article

Oceanic thermal structure mediates dive sequences in a foraging seabird

期刊

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 10, 期 13, 页码 6610-6622

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6393

关键词

behavioral complexity; Eudyptula minor; foraging behavior; fractal analysis; little penguin; sea surface temperature; thermocline

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  2. Australian Academy of Science
  3. Japan Science Society
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness
  5. Penguin Foundation
  6. Embassy of France in Australia
  7. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  8. Phillip Island Nature Parks

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes in marine ecosystems are easier to detect in upper-level predators, like seabirds, which integrate trophic interactions throughout the food web. Here, we examined whether diving parameters and complexity in the temporal organization of diving behavior of little penguins (Eudyptula minor) are influenced by sea surface temperature (SST), water stratification, and wind speed-three oceanographic features influencing prey abundance and distribution in the water column. Using fractal time series analysis, we found that foraging complexity, expressed as the degree of long-range correlations or memory in the dive series, was associated with SST and water stratification throughout the breeding season, but not with wind speed. Little penguins foraging in warmer/more-stratified waters exhibited greater determinism (memory) in foraging sequences, likely as a response to prey aggregations near the thermocline. They also showed higher foraging efficiency, performed more dives and dove to shallower depths than those foraging in colder/less-stratified waters. Reductions in the long-term memory of dive sequences, or in other words increases in behavioral stochasticity, may suggest different strategies concerning the exploration-exploitation trade-off under contrasting environmental conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据