4.7 Article

Relating meteorological parameters to glide-snow avalanche activity

期刊

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 57-68

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2016.05.003

关键词

Snow gliding; Meteorological influence; Glide-snow avalanche; Avalanche forecasting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glide-snow avalanched are notoriously difficult to predict, in part because we still do not fully understand the physical processes governing their release. Previous research has highlighted the presence of a wet basal layer as a prerequisite for glide-snow avalanche release. Different processes are believed to contribute to the formation of this basal layer in winter and in spring, since in winter the snowpack is usually cold and dry, while in spring it is warm and wet. We compared glide-snow avalanche activity to meteorological parameters of nearby weather stations for two winter seasons, the winter of 2008-2009 and the winter of 2011-2012. During both these winters, glide-snow avalanche activity was high in the Swiss Alps, posing a particular challenge to avalanche forecasting services. We used univariate and multivariate statistical methods to analyse the data for cold temperature events in winter and warm temperature events in spring, separately. For cold temperature events the minimum air temperature and the amount of new snow prior to avalanche release were the most significant variables, while for warm temperature events the most significant variables were air temperature, snow surface temperature derived from outgoing longwave radiation and decrease in snow height. Our results support the hypothesis that different processes result in the formation of glide-snow avalanches in winter and in spring. While the limited data set does not allow us to draw general conclusions, our results clearly indicate that treating cold and warm temperature events separately is of paramount importance to develop a widely applicable glide-snow avalanche forecasting model. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据