4.8 Article

Radiation Triggers a Dynamic Sequence of Transient Microglial Alterations in Juvenile Brain

期刊

CELL REPORTS
卷 31, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107699

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund
  2. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Stockholm County Council (ALF projects)
  5. Frimurare Barnhus Foundation in Stockholm
  6. KI Foundation for Research
  7. Marta and Gunnar V Philipson Foundation
  8. Swedish Brain Foundation
  9. Swedish Board of Radiation Safety
  10. Jane and Dan Olsson Foundations
  11. Lars Hierta Memorial Foundation
  12. Tore Nilsons Stiftelse for Medicinsk Forskning
  13. Foundation Tornspiran
  14. Ake Wiberg Foundation
  15. O.E. och Edla Johanssons Vetenskapliga Stiftelse
  16. Olle Engkvist Foundation
  17. Regenerative Medicine Minnesota
  18. NIH [NS109770]
  19. Humor To Fight The Tumor
  20. L.B. & Terrie McKelvey
  21. Board of Research at the Karolinska Institutet
  22. Research Committee at the Karolinska University Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cranial irradiation (IR), an effective tool to treat malignant brain tumors, triggers a chronic pro-inflammatory microglial response, at least in the adult brain. Using single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing, combined with histology, we show that the microglial response in the juvenile mouse hippocampus is rapid but returns toward normal within 1 week. The response is characterized by a series of temporally distinct homeostasis-, sensome-, and inflammation-related molecular signatures. We find that a single microglial cell simultaneously upregulates transcripts associated with pro- and anti-inflammatory microglial phenotypes. Finally, we show that juvenile and adult irradiated microglia are already transcriptionally distinct in the early phase after IR. Our results indicate that microglia are involved in the initial stages but may not be responsible for driving long-term inflammation in the juvenile brain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据