4.7 Article

Complete Photonic Band Gaps with Nonfrustrated ABC Bottlebrush Block Polymers

期刊

ACS MACRO LETTERS
卷 9, 期 7, 页码 1074-1080

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00380

关键词

-

资金

  1. DMREF Program of the National Science Foundation [DMR-1725414]
  2. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program [1650114]
  3. National Science Foundation [CNS-1725797]
  4. California NanoSystems Institute
  5. Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) at UC Santa Barbara [NSF DMR 1720256]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bottlebrush block polymers are a promising platform for self-assembled photonic materials, yet most work has been limited to one-dimensional photonic crystals based on the lamellar phase. Here we demonstrate with simulation that nonfrustrated ABC bottlebrush block polymers can be used to self-assemble three-dimensional photonic crystals with complete photonic band gaps. To show this, we have developed a computational approach that couples self-consistent field theory (SCFT) simulations to Maxwell's equations, thereby permitting a direct link between molecular design, self-assembly, and photonic band structures. Using this approach, we calculate the phase diagram of nonfrustrated ABC bottlebrush block polymers and identify regions where the alternating gyroid and alternating diamond phases are stable. By computing the photonic band structures of these phases, we demonstrate that complete band gaps can be found in regions of thermodynamic stability, thereby suggesting a route to realize these photonic materials experimentally. Furthermore, we demonstrate that gap size depends on volume fraction, segregation strength, and polymer architecture, and we identify a design strategy based on symmetry breaking that can achieve band gaps for lower values of refractive index contrast. Taken together, the approach presented here provides a powerful and flexible tool for predicting both the self-assembly and photonic band structures of polymeric materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据