4.5 Article

Multivariate multi-scale weighted permutation entropy analysis of EEG complexity for Alzheimer's disease

期刊

COGNITIVE NEURODYNAMICS
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 217-231

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11571-016-9418-9

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Electroencephalograph; Complexity; Weighted permutation entropy; Multivariate multi-scale entropy

资金

  1. Tianjin Municipal Natural Science Foundation [13JCZDJC27900]
  2. Tangshan Science and Technology Support Project [14130223B]
  3. Jilin Provincial Natural Science Foundation [20130101170JC]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complexity change of brain activity in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is an interesting topic for clinical purpose. To investigate the dynamical complexity of brain activity in AD, a multivariate multi-scale weighted permutation entropy (MMSWPE) method is proposed to measure the complexity of electroencephalograph (EEG) obtained in AD patients. MMSWPE combines the weighted permutation entropy and the multivariate multi-scale method. It is able to quantify not only the characteristics of different brain regions and multiple time scales but also the amplitude information contained in the multichannel EEG signals simultaneously. The effectiveness of the proposed method is verified by both the simulated chaotic signals and EEG recordings of AD patients. The simulation results from the Lorenz system indicate that MMSWPE has the ability to distinguish the multivariate signals with different complexity. In addition, the EEG analysis results show that in contrast with the normal group, the significantly decreased complexity of AD patients is distributed in the temporal and occipitoparietal regions for the theta and the alpha bands, and also distributed from the right frontal to the left occipitoparietal region for the theta, the alpha and the beta bands at each time scale, which may be attributed to the brain dysfunction. Therefore, it suggests that the MMSWPE method may be a promising method to reveal dynamic changes in AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据