4.7 Article

Resilience of Urban Transport Network-of-Networks under Intense Flood Hazards Exacerbated by Targeted Attacks

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66049-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's (PNNL) National Security Directorate Mission Seed Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program (PNNL, Richland, WA, campus)
  2. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory's (PNNL) National Security Directorate Mission Seed Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program (Northeastern University's Boston, MA, campus)
  3. US National Science Foundation's BIGDATA Award [1447587]
  4. INQUIRE Award [1735505]
  5. CyberSEES Award [1442728]
  6. United States Department of Energy [DE-AC05-76RL01830]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural hazards including floods can trigger catastrophic failures in interdependent urban transport network-of-networks (NoNs). Population growth has enhanced transportation demand while urbanization and climate change have intensified urban floods. However, despite the clear need to develop actionable insights for improving the resilience of critical urban lifelines, the theory and methods remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, as infrastructure systems become more intelligent, security experts point to the growing threat of targeted cyber-physical attacks during natural hazards. Here we develop a hypothesis-driven resilience framework for urban transport NoNs, which we demonstrate on the London Rail Network (LRN). We find that topological attributes designed for maximizing efficiency rather than robustness render the network more vulnerable to compound natural-targeted disruptions including cascading failures. Our results suggest that an organizing principle for post-disruption recovery may be developed with network science principles. Our findings and frameworks can generalize to urban lifelines and more generally to real-world spatial networks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据