4.7 Article

Bidirectional association between asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis: Two longitudinal follow-up studies using a national sample cohort

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66479-8

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2019R1H1A2080182, NRF-2018R1D1A1A02085328]
  2. Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2018K1A4A3A02060572]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate an epidemiologic association of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) using a national sample cohort of the Korean population. We collected data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service-National Sample Cohort between 2002 and 2013, and two different case-control cohorts were designed (1st: asthmatic patients matched in a 1:1 ratio with 204,119 non-asthmatics as control I, 2nd: CRS patients matched in a 1:4 ratio with 124,020 non-CRS patients as control II). Bidirectional association was examined using Cox proportional hazard models stratified by age, sex, income, and region of residence. Patients with asthma had an increased risk of developing CRS [adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.74 (1.67-1.80)], both with nasal polyps [1.55 (1.36-1.78)], without nasal polyps [1.74 (1.67-1.81)]. In the second cohort, patients with CRS had increased risk of developing asthma [1.85 (1.80-1.91)] with similar results for those with and without nasal polyps. The strongest association for risk of CRS was in 20-39 years old men with asthma [2.41 (1.97-2.96)], while the strongest association for increased risk of asthma in those with CRS group was also seen in this same subgroup [2.40 (2.18-2.63)]. CRS and asthma had a bidirectional influence on each other. CRS increased the risk of asthma, and asthma increased the risk of CRS, especially in young men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据