4.7 Article

Bioluminescence for in vivo detection of cell-type-specific inflammation in a mouse model of uveitis

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68227-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research to Prevent Blindness career development award
  2. Alcon Research Institute Young Investigators Grant
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness
  4. Mark J. Daily, MD Research Fund
  5. Graham and Brenda Siddall Uveitis Research Fund
  6. Cell Analysis Facility Flow Cytometry and Imaging Core in the Department of Immunology at The University of Washington
  7. [R01 EY030431]
  8. [K08 EY023998]
  9. [P30-EY001730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the use of cell-type-specific in vivo bioluminescence to measure intraocular immune cell population dynamics during the course of inflammation in a mouse model of uveitis. Transgenic lines expressing luciferase in inflammatory cell subsets (myeloid cells, T cells, and B cells) were generated and ocular bioluminescence was measured serially for 35 days following uveitis induction. Ocular leukocyte populations were identified using flow cytometry and compared to the ocular bioluminescence profile. Acute inflammation is neutrophilic (75% of ocular CD45+cells) which is reflected by a significant increase in ocular bioluminescence in one myeloid reporter line on day 2. By day 7, the ocular T cell population increases to 50% of CD45+cells, leading to a significant increase in ocular bioluminescence in the T cell reporter line. While initially negligible (<1% of CD45+cells), the ocular B cell population increases to>4% by day 35. This change is reflected by a significant increase in the ocular bioluminescence of the B cell reporter line starting on day 28. Our data demonstrates that cell-type-specific in vivo bioluminescence accurately detects changes in multiple intraocular immune cell populations over time in experimental uveitis. This assay could also be useful in other inflammatory disease models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据