4.7 Article

High resolution spatial analyses of trace elements in coccoliths reveal new insights into element incorporation in coccolithophore calcite

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66503-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. SIR-2014 (Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca-Scientific Independence of young Researchers)
  2. PRIN [2017RX9XXXY]
  3. Italian Ministry of Education (MIUR) through the project Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2018-2022, Le Geoscienze per la Societa: Risorse e loro evoluzione

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Coccolithophores are phytoplanktonic algae which produce an exoskeleton made of single platelets of calcite named coccoliths. They are widespread in all oceans and directly impact the short- and long-term C cycle. The study of coccolith size, morphology and elemental composition reveals important information regarding the ability of the cell to calcify and on the factors that influence this process. In this regard, very little is known about coccolith composition and its changes under altered environmental conditions. Here, we present high resolution (50 x 50nm) elemental spatial distribution in pristine coccoliths of Coccolithus pelagicus and Gephyrocapsa oceanica reconstructed via X-ray fluorescence analyses at synchrotron. The studied specimens are from control culture and metal-enriched (V, Ni, Zn and Pb) experiments. The analysed specimens produced under stress conditions, display an irregular shape and are thinner, especially in the external rim, with ca. 1/3 lower Ca concentrations compared to specimens from the control. The same specimens also have higher Sr/Ca ratio with highest values in the coccolith external rim, suggesting that difficulty in calcification is additionally reflected in increased Sr/Ca ratios. Selenium is found in the coccolith as possible substitute of carbonate in the calcite. V and Pb apparently did not interact with the coccoliths while Zn and Ni were deposited on the coccolith surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据