4.7 Article

Effects of Cocoa-Rich Chocolate on Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Risk Factors, and Arterial Stiffness in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial

期刊

NUTRIENTS
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu12061758

关键词

arterial pressure; vascular stiffness; risk factors; chocolate; postmenopause

资金

  1. Gerencia Regional de Salud de Castilla y Leon [GRS 1583/B/17]
  2. Institute of Health Carlos III of the Ministry of Science and Technology (Spain) through the Network for Prevention and Health Promotion in Primary Care [RD16/0007]
  3. European Union's ERDF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the intake of 10 g of cocoa-rich chocolate on blood pressure, other cardiovascular risk factors, and vascular structure and function in postmenopausal women. A total of 140 postmenopausal women participated in this randomized and controlled parallel clinical trial. For six months, the intervention group (IG;n= 73) consumed daily 10 g of chocolate (99% cocoa) added to their usual food intake, whereas the control group (CG;n= 67) did not receive any intervention. Blood pressure, pulse pressure (PP), cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), ankle-brachial index (ABI), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), augmentation index, and laboratory variables were measured at baseline and six months. ANCOVA analyses adjusted for baseline values revealed no significant differences for systolic blood pressure (-1.45 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.79, 1.88;p= 0.391) or baPWV (0.18 m/s; 95% CI: -0.14, 0.50;p= 0.263) between groups. A decrease in PP was observed in the IG compared to the CG (-2.05 mm Hg; 95% CI: -4.08, -0.02;p= 0.048). The rest of the vascular structure and function parameters and other measured variables remained unchanged. The daily intake of 10 g of cocoa-rich chocolate seems to provide little improvement to cardiovascular health, but neither does it cause any adverse effects on the parameters evaluated in postmenopausal women in the long term.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据