4.3 Article

Efficiency and Target Derepression of Anti-miR-92a: Results of a First in Human Study

期刊

NUCLEIC ACID THERAPEUTICS
卷 30, 期 6, 页码 335-345

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/nat.2020.0871

关键词

anti-miR; miR-92a; first in human; single cell sequencing

资金

  1. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)
  2. Leducq Network MIRVAD
  3. Rolf M. Schwiete foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MicroRNA (miRNA) inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy in several disease indications. MRG-110 is a locked nucleic acid-based antisense oligonucleotide that targets miR-92a-3p and experimentally was shown to have documented therapeutic effects on cardiovascular disease and wound healing. To gain first insights into the activity of anti-miR-92a in humans, we investigated miR-92a-3p expression in several blood compartments and assessed the effect of MRG-110 on target derepression. Healthy adults were randomly assigned (5:2) to receive a single intravenous dose of MRG-110 or placebo in one of seven sequential ascending intravenous dose cohorts ranging from 0.01 to 1.5 mg/kg body weight. MiR-92a-3p whole blood levels were time and dose dependently decreased with half-maximal inhibition of 0.27 and 0.31 mg/kg at 24 and 72 h after dosing, respectively. In the high-dose groups, >95% inhibition was detected at 24-72 h postinfusion and significant inhibition was observed for 2 weeks. Similar inhibitory effects were detected in isolated CD31(+)cells, and miR-92a-3p expression was also inhibited in extracellular vesicles in the high-dose group. Target derepression was measured in whole blood and showed thatITGA5andCD93were increased at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg. Single-cell RNA sequencing of peripheral blood cells revealed a cell type-specific derepression of miR-92a targets. Together this study demonstrates that systemic infusion of anti-miR-92a efficiently inhibits miR-92a in the peripheral blood compartment and derepresses miR-92a targets in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据