4.8 Article

Understanding and managing connected extreme events

期刊

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 611-621

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-0790-4

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation's Prediction of and Resilience against Extreme Events (PREEVENTS) program
  2. Aon
  3. Columbia University Initiative on Extreme Weather and Climate
  4. NOAA's Consortium for Climate Risk in the Urban Northeast (CCRUN)
  5. World Climate Research Programme's (WCRP) Grand Challenge on Weather and Climate Extremes
  6. European COST Action `Understanding and modeling compound climate and weather events' (DAMOCLES) [CA17109]
  7. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  8. NOAA RISA Program [NA15OAR4310147]
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation [179876, 178751]
  10. National Science Foundation [AGS-1929382]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extreme weather and climate events and their impacts can occur in complex combinations, an interaction shaped by physical drivers and societal forces. In these situations, governance, markets and other decision-making structures-together with population exposure and vulnerability-create nonphysical interconnections among events by linking their impacts, to positive or negative effect. Various anthropogenic actions can also directly affect the severity of events, further complicating these feedback loops. Such relationships are rarely characterized or considered in physical-sciences-based research contexts. Here, we present a multidisciplinary argument for the concept of connected extreme events, and we suggest vantage points and approaches for producing climate information useful in guiding decisions about them. The impacts of extreme weather and climate can be amplified by physical interactions among events and across a complex set of societal factors. This Perspective discusses the concept and challenge of connected extreme events, exploring research approaches and decision-making strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据