4.2 Article

Community pharmacists' professional practices for complementary medicines: a qualitative study in New Zealand

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 1109-1117

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01093-2

关键词

CAD; CAM; Complementary; alternative medicines; Community pharmacists; Ethics; Interviews; New Zealand; Professional practice; Views

资金

  1. University of Auckland [3608425]
  2. New Zealand Pharmacy Education Fund [173]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundComplementary medicines are a popular healthcare choice among patients/consumers, and most pharmacies sell these products. Pharmacists are well-placed to advise on complementary medicines, but their training and practices for these products are not optimal. Pharmacists' professional practices for complementary medicines ought to be influenced by professional codes of ethics and standards.ObjectiveTo examine community pharmacists' perspectives on complementary medicines in New Zealand, including motivations and justifications for selling these products, and professional and ethical issues complementary medicines raise for pharmacists.SettingCommunity pharmacists in New Zealand.MethodQualitative, semi-structured interviews with 27 New Zealand practising community pharmacists identified through purposive and convenience sampling.Main outcome measureParticipants' views, experiences, and professional practices for complementary medicines.ResultsParticipants struggled to clearly describe products they considered complementary medicines. Perspectives towards these products ranged from strongly supportive to somewhat sceptical; none was strongly opposed. Participants had several motivations for selling complementary medicines, particularly consumer demand and profits. Participants acknowledged ethical issues concerning complementary medicines, including lack of evidence of efficacy and pharmacists' limited training/knowledge. Few referred explicitly to complementary-medicines-related statements in the Pharmacy Council of New Zealand's Code of Ethics, or indicated these guided their practice.ConclusionParticipants sold complementary medicines despite having limited knowledge on these products and concerns about efficacy; participants justified this as they believe they are providing an holistic option for patients, and/or ensuring complementary medicines do no harm. Participants were mindful of ethical/professional issues regarding complementary medicines, but were not necessarily aware of, or guided by, explicit statements in the Pharmacy Council of New Zealand's Code of Ethics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据