4.8 Review

Designing Advanced Lithium-Based Batteries for Low-Temperature Conditions

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 38, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202001972

关键词

desolvation; lithium batteries; lithium-metal anodes; lithium-sulfur batteries; low-temperature operation

资金

  1. NASA Space Technology Research Fellowship (NSTRF) [80NSSC17K0089]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy-dense rechargeable batteries have enabled a multitude of applications in recent years. Moving forward, they are expected to see increasing deployment in performance-critical areas such as electric vehicles, grid storage, space, defense, and subsea operations. While this at first glance spells great promise for conventional lithium-ion batteries, all of these use-cases, unfortunately, share periodic and recurring exposures to extremely low-temperature conditions, a performance constraint where the lithium-ion chemistry can fail to perform optimally. Next-generation chemistries employing alternative anodes with increased solvent compatibility or altogether different operating mechanisms could present an avenue for overcoming many of the low-temperature hurdles intrinsic to the lithium-ion battery. In this article, a brief overview of the challenges in developing lithium-ion batteries for low-temperature use is provided, and then an array of nascent battery chemistries are introduced that may be intrinsically better suited for low-temperature conditions moving forward. Specifically, the prospects of using lithium-metal, lithium-sulfur, and dual-ion batteries for performance-critical low-temperature applications are evaluated. These three chemistries are presented as prototypical examples of how the conventional low-temperature charge-transfer resistances can be overcome. However, these three chemistries also present their own unique challenges at low temperatures, highlighting the balance between traditional low-temperature electrolyte design and next-generation approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据