4.8 Article

Highly Elastic Binder for Improved Cyclability of Nickel-Rich Layered Cathode Materials in Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 10, 期 29, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202001069

关键词

cation mixing; hard segments; micro-cracks; soft segments; transition metal dissolution

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea grant [NRF-2017M1A2A2044504, NRF-2018M1A2A2063340, NRF-2018R1A2A1A19023146, NRF-2020M3H4A3081874]
  2. Institute of Engineering Research (IER) at Seoul National University
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2018R1A2A1A19023146] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nickel-rich layered cathode materials are predominantly used for lithium-ion batteries intended for electric vehicles owing to their high specific capacities and minimal use of high-cost cobalt. The intrinsic drawbacks of nickel-rich layered cathode materials with regard to cycle life and safety have largely been addressed by doping and by applying surface coatings. Here, it is reported that a highly elastic binder, namely spandex, can overcome the problems of nickel-rich layered cathode materials and improve their electrochemical properties drastically. The high elasticity of spandex allows it to uniformly coat LiNi(0.8)Co(0.1)Mn(0.1)O(2)particles via shear force during slurry mixing to protect the particles from undesired interfacial reactions during cycling. The uniform coating of spandex, together with its hydrogen bonding interaction with LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2, leads to enhanced particle-to-particle interaction, which has multiple advantages, such as high loading capability, superior rate and cycling performance, and low binder content. This study highlights the promise of elastic binders to meet the ever-challenging criteria with respect to nickel-rich cathode materials in cells targeting electric vehicles.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据