4.8 Article

Controlling Selectivity and Stability in the Hydrocarbon Wet-Reforming Reaction Using Well-Defined Ni plus Ga Intermetallic Compound Catalysts

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 10, 期 16, 页码 8968-8980

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01261

关键词

model catalyst materials; non-noble metal catalysts; surface science; rational catalyst design; propane wet reforming

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) CAREER [CBET-1752063]
  2. American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund [57589-ND5]
  3. National Science Foundation [TG-CTS140009]
  4. Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS) at Oak Ridge National Lab (ORNL) [CNMS2018-374]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we present the use of compositionally and structurally well-defined, oxide-supported nanoparticle Ni + Ga intermetallic compound (IMC) catalysts in the wet reforming of propane. The definition of the IMC catalysts allowed for more direct connections to be made between catalyst bulk and surface compositions and catalyst performance in wet reforming. We show that Ni + Ga catalysts exhibit comparable or better rates of reaction on a per-site basis and improved stability in comparison to other leading formulations. We also demonstrate excellent control over product selectivity as a function of Ni + Ga IMC bulk and surface compositions with nearly ideal selectivity toward CO2/H-2 or CO/H-2 achieved. Selectivity toward the production of smaller hydrocarbons could also be suppressed significantly due to uniquely limited rehydrogenation kinetics of the Ni + Ga IMCs. Our studies also shed light on the stability of Ni + Ga IMCs under reaction conditions and how high conversion in reactions that involve many strongly bound reaction intermediates can lead to IMC phase relaxation to the most stable phase with concomitant surface composition and catalytic performance changes. Correlations between surface chemistry and catalyst performance were afforded by both the well-defined nature of the IMCs and computational surface science studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据