4.8 Article

Targeted gene correction of human hematopoietic stem cells for the treatment of Wiskott - Aldrich Syndrome

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17626-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [104807/Z/14/Z, 201250/Z/16/Z]
  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
  3. University College London
  4. University College London Therapeutic Acceleration Support fund
  5. NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Stem Cells and Immunotherapies at University College London
  6. Wellcome Trust [201250/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is an X-linked primary immunodeficiency with severe platelet abnormalities and complex immunodeficiency. Although clinical gene therapy approaches using lentiviral vectors have produced encouraging results, full immune and platelet reconstitution is not always achieved. Here we show that a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing strategy allows the precise correction of WAS mutations in up to 60% of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), without impairing cell viability and differentiation potential. Delivery of the editing reagents to WAS HSPCs led to full rescue of WASp expression and correction of functional defects in myeloid and lymphoid cells. Primary and secondary transplantation of corrected WAS HSPCs into immunodeficient mice showed persistence of edited cells for up to 26 weeks and efficient targeting of long-term repopulating stem cells. Finally, no major genotoxicity was associated with the gene editing process, paving the way for an alternative, yet highly efficient and safe therapy. In recent years, hematopoietic stem cells gene editing has emerged as a promising tool to treat blood disorders. Here the authors develop a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing strategy that allows the precise correction of Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome in vitro and in vivo with high efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据