4.8 Article

Mechanisms of microtubule dynamics and force generation examined with computational modeling and electron cryotomography

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17553-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [17-74-20152]
  2. NIH [GM033787]
  3. NSF CAREER award [1651841]
  4. intramural programs of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
  5. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute
  6. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1651841] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [ZIANS003164] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. Russian Science Foundation [17-74-20152] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microtubules are dynamic tubulin polymers responsible for many cellular processes, including the capture and segregation of chromosomes during mitosis. In contrast to textbook models of tubulin self-assembly, we have recently demonstrated that microtubules elongate by addition of bent guanosine triphosphate tubulin to the tips of curving protofilaments. Here we explore this mechanism of microtubule growth using Brownian dynamics modeling and electron cryotomography. The previously described flaring shapes of growing microtubule tips are remarkably consistent under various assembly conditions, including different tubulin concentrations, the presence or absence of a polymerization catalyst or tubulin-binding drugs. Simulations indicate that development of substantial forces during microtubule growth and shortening requires a high activation energy barrier in lateral tubulin-tubulin interactions. Modeling offers a mechanism to explain kinetochore coupling to growing microtubule tips under assisting force, and it predicts a load-dependent acceleration of microtubule assembly, providing a role for the flared morphology of growing microtubule ends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据