4.8 Article

Combustible ice mimicking behavior of hydrogen-bonded organic framework at ambient condition

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16976-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale, Hefei Science Center of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. Fujian Institute of Innovation of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21571167, 51502282]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2060190053, WK2060190100]
  5. Anhui Province Natural Science Foundation [1608085MB28]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption of guest molecules by porous materials proceeds in a spontaneous exothermic way, whereas desorption usually requires external energy input as an endothermic process. Reducing such energy consumption makes great sense in practice. Here we report the reversible and automatic methanol (MeOH) adsorption/release in an ionic hydrogen-bonded organic framework (iHOF) constructed from guanidinium cation and borate anion ([B(OCH3)(4)](3)[C(NH2)(3)](4)Cl center dot 4CH(3)OH, termed Gd-B) at ambient condition. The metastable Gd-B automatically releases all sixteen MeOH molecules (63.4wt%) via desorption and tetra-methyl borate hydrolysis at ambient atmosphere and the structure can be recovered when re-exposed to MeOH vapor or liquid, mimicking combustible ice behavior but at ambient condition. Reversible capture/release of four guest MeOH molecules is also realized without destroying its crystal structure. The combustible Gd-B paves a way for exploring metastable iHOF materials as carrier for alternative energy source and drug delivery etc. Porous materials function as sorbents for gas storage but release of guest molecules often needs extra energy. Here the authors report reversible methanol adsorption and release in a hydrogen-bonded organic framework, which mimics combustible ice behavior but under ambient condition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据