4.8 Article

Synergism between IL7R and CXCR4 drives BCR-ABL induced transformation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16927-w

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB1074, SFB1279]
  3. ERC advanced grant [694992]
  4. Chief Scientist Office grant [ETM/374]
  5. Egyptian Ministry of Higher Education (MoHE)
  6. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) [91528030]
  7. Department of Molecular Biology, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Division, National Research Centre (NRC) in Egypt
  8. Wilhelm Sander Stiftung [2016.110.1]
  9. Deutsche Jose-Carreras Leukamiestiftung [DJCLS 17R/2017]
  10. NIH/NCI [R35CA197628, R01CA157644, R01CA213138]
  11. Norman and Sadie Lee Foundation for Pediatric Cancer
  12. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [DISC2-10061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is characterized by the expression of an oncogenic fusion kinase termed BCR-ABL1. Here, we show that interleukin 7 receptor (IL7R) interacts with the chemokine receptor CXCR4 to recruit BCR-ABL1 and JAK kinases in close proximity. Treatment with BCR-ABL1 kinase inhibitors results in elevated expression of IL7R which enables the survival of transformed cells when IL7 was added together with the kinase inhibitors. Importantly, treatment with anti-IL7R antibodies prevents leukemia development in xenotransplantation models using patient-derived Ph+ ALL cells. Our results suggest that the association between IL7R and CXCR4 serves as molecular platform for BCR-ABL1-induced transformation and development of Ph+ ALL. Targeting this platform with anti-IL7R antibody eliminates Ph+ ALL cells including those with resistance to commonly used ABL1 kinase inhibitors. Thus, anti-IL7R antibodies may provide alternative treatment options for ALL in general and may suppress incurable drug-resistant leukemia forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据