4.8 Article

Cobalt-catalyzed highly enantioselective hydrogenation of α,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17057-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Southern University of Science and Technology
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [KQTD20150717103157174, JSGG20170821140353405]
  3. Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Catalysis [2020B121201002]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21901107, 21991113]
  5. SZDRC Discipline Construction Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Asymmetric hydrogenation of alpha,beta -unsaturated acids catalyzed by noble metals has been well established, whereas, the asymmetric hydrogenation with earth-abundant-metal was rarely reported. Here, we describe a cobalt-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of alpha,beta -unsaturated carboxylic acids. By using chiral cobalt catalyst bearing electron-donating diphosphine ligand, high activity (up to 1860 TON) and excellent enantioselectivity (up to >99% ee) are observed. Furthermore, the cobalt-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation is successfully applied to a broad spectrum of alpha,beta -unsaturated carboxylic acids, such as various alpha -aryl and alpha -alkyl cinnamic acid derivatives, alpha -oxy-functionalized alpha,beta -unsaturated acids, alpha -substituted acrylic acids and heterocyclic alpha,beta -unsaturated acids (30 examples). The synthetic utility of the protocol is highlighted by the synthesis of key intermediates for chiral drugs (6 cases). Preliminary mechanistic studies reveal that the carboxy group may be involved in the control of the reactivity and enantioselectivity through an interaction with the metal centre. A large number of marketed drugs contains a chiral carboxylic acid scaffold. Here, the authors report the asymmetric hydrogenation of alpha,beta -unsaturated carboxylic acids to alpha -chiral carboxylic acids using a cobalt catalyst bearing an electron-donating chiral diphosphine ligand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据