4.5 Article

Deep learning for smart fish farming: applications, opportunities and challenges

期刊

REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 66-90

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/raq.12464

关键词

advanced analytics; aquaculture; deep learning; smart fish farming

资金

  1. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2019YFD0901004]
  2. Youth Research Fund of Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences [QNJJ202014]
  3. Beijing Excellent Talents Development Project [2017000057592G125]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper explores the applications of deep learning in aquaculture, highlighting its ability to automatically extract features in smart fish farming, while also noting challenges such as the need for large amounts of labelled data.
The rapid emergence of deep learning (DL) technology has resulted in its successful use in various fields, including aquaculture. DL creates both new opportunities and a series of challenges for information and data processing in smart fish farming. This paper focuses on applications of DL in aquaculture, including live fish identification, species classification, behavioural analysis, feeding decisions, size or biomass estimation, and water quality prediction. The technical details of DL methods applied to smart fish farming are also analysed, including data, algorithms and performance. The review results show that the most significant contribution of DL is its ability to automatically extract features. However, challenges still exist; DL is still in a weak artificial intelligence stage and requires large amounts of labelled data for training, which has become a bottleneck that restricts further DL applications in aquaculture. Nevertheless, DL still offers breakthroughs for addressing complex data in aquaculture. In brief, our purpose is to provide researchers and practitioners with a better understanding of the current state of the art of DL in aquaculture, which can provide strong support for implementing smart fish farming applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据