4.5 Article

Large tumor size, lymphovascular invasion, and synchronous metastasis are associated with the recurrence of solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas

期刊

HPB
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 220-230

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.05.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning [NRF2012R1A1A2003360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lymphovascular invasion and a higher T category were worse prognostic factors for recurrence in SPN patients with malignant histologic features. Longer follow-up may be required for SPN patients with malignant histologic features.
Background: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms (SPNs) of the pancreas have low malignant potential. However, malignant SPNs are not fully understood. Methods: To evaluate risk factors affecting malignant potential, the clinicopathologic features of 375 surgically resected SPNs were compared. Results: Fifty (13.3%) had malignant histologic features. Twenty-seven and 22 had perineural and lymphovascular invasions, respectively. Adjacent organ invasion was noted in 9 cases. Recurrence occurred in 8 cases. The median recurrence time after surgical resection was 67 months and was associated with a higher pT category (P = 0.001), lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001), and synchronous metastasis (P < 0.001). SPN patients with malignant histologic features had worse recurrence-free survival (RFS; 10-year survival rate, 73.2%) than those without malignant histologic features (96.3%; P = 0.01). Patients with a higher pT category (P = 0.04), synchronous metastasis (P < 0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.01) had worse RFS. Lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.042) and a higher T category (P = 0.002) were poor prognostic factors for recurrence. Conclusion: Lymphovascular invasion and a higher T category were worse prognostic factors for recurrence in SPN patients with malignant histologic features. For SPN patients with malignant histologic features, a longer follow-up may be required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据