4.4 Article

Synthesis of Modified Metal Organic Skeleton and Its Adsorption of Hydrochloric Acid Wastewater, Mercury and Arsenic in Water

期刊

SCIENCE OF ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 7, 页码 1078-1089

出版社

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/sam.2020.3772

关键词

Metal Organic Skeleton; UiO-66; Hg(II); As(III); Hydrochloric Acid

资金

  1. Scientific research project of basic scientific research business expenses of provincial colleges and universities in Heilongjiang Province [2019-KYYWFMY-0055]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal organic skeleton (MOFs) is a kind of porous material composed of metal ions and organic ligands through coordination, which can be used to absorb a lot of toxic substances from waste water. In this research, UiO-66, UiO-66(Zr) and UiO-66(Zr)-2COOH were synthesized by solvent thermal method, and physical analysis was conducted on the adsorbent properties of the materials by means of XRD, IR, Zeta potential, etc. In the adsorption test of wastewater impurities, UiO-66(Zr)-2COOH was firstly taken as the research object. With the increase of the initial concentration of hydrochloric acid, the adsorption capacity of the organic skeleton was greatly increased. However, when the concentration increases further, the growth rate of adsorption decreases, and with the increase of temperature, the adsorption decreases further. The organic skeleton of Hg(II) adsorption process conforms to the secondary dynamic adsorption model. At the same time, the organic skeleton materials of Hg(II) has strong ability of recognition, the recognition of Hg(II) sex is much stronger than the Ni(II) identification. Uio-66(Zr) and UiO-66(Zr)-2COOH are selected for adsorption of As, and the adsorption process of the two kinds of materials of As is close to the Freundlich model(III). The ability of absorbing As(III) of these p materials is stronger than the ability of As(V). At the same time, UiO-66(Zr)-2COOH shows higher adsorption capacity on the As(III), and maximum adsorption capacity is 220 mg/g.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据