4.1 Article

A new exploration of white globe appearance (WGA) in ulcerative lesions

期刊

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE
卷 58, 期 8, 页码 754-760

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/a-1200-2287

关键词

white globe appearance; ulcerative lesions; early gastric cancer; ME-NBI; stomach neoplasm

资金

  1. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Science and Technology of China [18411952900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim White globe appearance (WGA), a small white lesion with a globular shape that can be clearly visualized by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI), was reported to be a reliable marker of early gastric cancer (EGC). However, we found that this endoscopic presentation could also be seen in non-cancerous tissues, especially in ulcerative lesions. This study aimed to further investigate the diagnostic value of WGA in differentiating non-cancerous lesions from EGC in ulcer-type cases. Materials and Methods We retrospectively reviewed 54 cases of EGC and 155 cases of non-cancerous lesions in this study, all of which had endoscopic imaging data of ME-NBI scanning and pathological data of biopsy or resected specimens. The correlation of the prevalence of WGA and ulcerative lesions, as well as the characteristics of WGA between the 2 groups were analyzed in this study. Results WGA was more common in ulcerative lesions (27.6 %, 21/76) than in non-ulcerative lesions (3.8 %, 5/133) (p < 0.001) in our study. In the ulcerative cases, no significant difference in prevalence of WGA was observed between EGC and non-cancerous lesions (p = 0.532). Compared with WGA in EGC, WGA in non-cancerous lesions tended to show the characteristic of tree-branch-like vessels on globular shape (p < 0.001). Conclusions WGA is more likely to occur in ulcerative lesions, and the presence of WGA alone cannot distinguish EGC from non-cancerous lesions in ulcer-type cases. In WGA-positive tissue, tree-branch-like vessels of globular shape may provide a certain clinical value in diagnosis of non-cancerous lesions or EGC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据