4.4 Article

A combined current density technique for the electrochemical oxidation of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) with boron-doped diamond

期刊

WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL
卷 35, 期 1, 页码 158-165

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/wej.12616

关键词

boron-doped diamond; combined current density; electrochemical oxidation; ion-exchange regeneration solution; PFAS; PFOA

资金

  1. Fraunhofer USA Inc.
  2. Center for Coatings and Diamond Technologies
  3. Clifford Humphrys Fellowship for Water Quality in the Great Lakes
  4. Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) through the Michigan Translational Research and Commercialization (MTRAC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study utilized a boron-doped diamond electrode stack and a combined current density technique to reduce energy consumption for treating PFOA; previous methods developed were only applicable to non-fluorinated compounds, while this study specifically targeted PFAS; promising results were also observed in the treatment of an ion-exchange regeneration solution.
Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have unique properties that limit their degradability in the environment. One of these PFAS is an acid (PFOA). Electrochemical oxidation is a promising method for remediation, but energy costs are high. To limit the energy consumption, this study used a boron-doped diamond (BDD) electrode stack and a combined current density technique that employed 50 mA/cm(2)for the first 0.25 hours then lowered the current density to 1, 5, or 10 mA/cm(2). This technique is similar to one developed previously; however, that method was only developed for compounds comprising of carbon, oxygen and nitrogen, whereas PFAS have the addition of fluorine. For the degradation of PFOA, the combined current density of 50 and 5 mA/cm(2)(50&5) allowed for a 37% reduction in energy usage to obtain 75% defluorination compared to using 50 mA/cm(2)alone. Further investigation into remediating an ion-exchange regeneration solution shows great promise.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据