4.6 Article

Removal of High Levels of Cyanide and COD from Cassava Industrial Wastewater by a Fixed-Film Sequencing Batch Reactor

期刊

WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION
卷 231, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-020-04642-7

关键词

Fixed-film sequencing batch reactor; Hydraulic retention time; Mixed microbial culture; Cyanide and COD removal; Specific growth rate

资金

  1. Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fixed-film sequencing batch reactor, or F-SBR, was developed to treat high organic compound levels and toxic cyanide concentrations in cassava wastewater. The performance of the F-SBR was compared with that of a conventional sequencing batch reactor, or SBR, that was operated with organic compound contents of 16,266.67-26,666 mg COD/L and 132.92-252.66 mg CN-/L. The cyanide and chemical oxygen demand removal efficiencies of the conventional SBR system were 42.61% and 36.83%, respectively, while those of the F-SBR were 77.95% and 74.43%, respectively; the cyanide removal efficiency reached 95.45% when the hydraulic retention time was increased to 5 days, and the F-SBR was very effective for the complete removal of cyanide when the hydraulic retention time was increased to 10 days. This effectiveness was similar to the effectiveness of chemical oxygen demand removal, which reached 40-78% efficiency with the F-SBR system. These results showed that the immobilization of cyanide-degrading bacteria such asAgrobacterium tumefaciensSUTS 1 andPseudomonas monteiliiSUTS 2 carried out with a polypropylene ring in a fixed-film aerobic system enhanced the performance of the reactor and can be successfully applied for cyanide and chemical oxygen demand removal from industrial wastewater with high cyanide and chemical oxygen demand concentrations. This study may provide a promising alternative technique that reduces economic operation costs in solving wastewater contamination problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据