4.6 Article

Deep color transfer using histogram analogy

期刊

VISUAL COMPUTER
卷 36, 期 10-12, 页码 2129-2143

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-020-01921-6

关键词

Color transfer; Histogram analogy; Photo-realistic style transfer; Recolorization

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and ICT, Korea, through IITP Grants [IITP-2015-0-00174, IITP-2019- 0-01906]
  2. NRF [NRF-2017M3C4A7066317]
  3. Institute for Information & Communication Technology Planning & Evaluation (IITP), Republic of Korea [2015-0-00174-006] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20131612206] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a novel approach to transferring the color of a reference image to a given source image. Although there can be diverse pairs of source and reference images in terms of content and composition similarity, previous methods are not capable of covering the whole diversity. To resolve this limitation, we propose a deep neural network that leveragescolor histogram analogyfor color transfer. A histogram contains essential color information of an image, and our network utilizes the analogy between the source and reference histograms to modulate the color of the source image with abstract color features of the reference image. In our approach, histogram analogy is exploited basically among the whole images, but it can also be applied to semantically corresponding regions in the case that the source and reference images have similar contents with different compositions. Experimental results show that our approach effectively transfers the reference colors to the source images in a variety of settings. We also demonstrate a few applications of our approach, such as palette-based recolorization, color enhancement, and color editing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据