4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Capsular serotypes, antimicrobial susceptibility, and the presence of transferable oxazolidinone resistance genes in Streptococcus suis isolated from healthy pigs in China

期刊

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
卷 247, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108750

关键词

Antimicrobial susceptibility; optrA; Pigs; Serotype; Streptococcus suis

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0501304, 2016YFD0501305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptococcus suis is a pig pathogen and a vector of zoonotic diseases that can cause severe systemic infection in humans. S. suis can colonize the nasal cavity, tonsils, and upper respiratory, genital, and digestive tracts in healthy pigs. Here, to determine prevalence, serotype distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility of S. suis in healthy pigs, we collected 1813 nasal cavity samples from healthy pigs raised on 17 independent farms in six Chinese provinces between 2016 and 2018. We obtained 223 S. suis isolates (12.3 %) and the antimicrobial susceptibility to a panel of 11 antimicrobial agents was measured by microbroth dilution. Most S. suis isolates (98.7 %) were resistant to at least three classes of antimicrobial agents. The optrA gene conferring resistance to oxazolidinones and phenicols was identified in the chromosome of 27 isolates and on a similar to 40-kb plasmid in one isolate; to the best of our knowledge, this was the first report of plasmid-borne optrA gene in S. suis. The genetic environment of optrA showed substantial diversity and could be divided into eleven different types. Interestingly, some fragments of the 89 K pathogenicity island (PAI) were observed together with optrA in 3 isolates, which warrants further attention. Capsular serotypes of S. suis isolates were determined by multiplex PCR. Serotype 29 was the most prevalent, followed by serotype 7 and serotype 2. The presence of highly virulent serotype 2 strains may pose a threat to public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据