4.7 Article

Intensified dissolution of uranium from graphite substrate using ultrasound

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 65, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105066

关键词

Uranium; Dissolution; Graphite; Kinetics; Ultrasound; Intensification; Erosion

资金

  1. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Decontamination of graphite structural elements and recovery of uranium is crucial for waste minimization and recycle of nuclear fuel elements. Feasibility of intensified dissolution of uranium-impregnated graphite substrate using ultrasound has been studied with objective of establishing the effect of operating parameters and the kinetics of sonocatalytic dissolution of uranium in nitric acid. The effect of operating frequency and acoustic intensity as well as the acid concentration and temperature on the dissolution of metal has been elucidated. It was observed that at lower acid concentrations (6 M-8 M), the dissolution ratio increases by 15% on increasing the bath temperature from 45 to 70 degrees C. At higher acid concentration (> 10 M), the increase was only around 5-7% for a similar change in temperature. With 12 M HNO3, pitting was also observed on the graphite surface along with erosion due to high local reaction rates in the presence of ultrasound. For higher frequency of applied ultrasound, lower dissolution rate of uranium was observed though it also leads to high rates of erosion of the substrate. It was thus established that suitable optimization of frequency is required based on the nature of the substrate and the choice of recycling it. The dissolution rate was also demonstrated to increase with acoustic intensity fill it reaches to the maximum at the observed optimum (1.2 W/cm(2) at 33 kHz). Comparison with silent conditions revealed that enhanced rate was obtained due to the use of ultrasound under optimum conditions. The work has demonstrated the effective application of ultrasound for intensifying the extent of dissolution of metal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据