4.7 Article

Key determinants and heterogeneous frailties in passenger loyalty toward customized buses: An empirical investigation of the subscription termination hazard of users

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102636

关键词

Demand responsive bus; Subscription behavior; User loyalty; Demand evolution; Shared frailty model

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51378091, 71871043]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [20170540187]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT18GJ204]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term passenger subscription is vital to the survival and operation of the customized bus (CB) system, which is a demand-driven and user-oriented transit service. A better understanding of passenger loyalty toward the CB service will help provide better operation. The urgent and outstanding issue is how to incorporate the unobserved heterogeneity in loyalty-in other words, how to reflect the effects of the frailty to terminate subscription. This study fills the research gap through an empirical study in Dalian, China. Three different survival models are developed to investigate the mechanism of subscription behaviors, among which the shared frailty model considering the unobserved heterogeneity is demonstrated to be the most appropriate. The results indicate that the historical purchase characteristics are the most important to CB user loyalty modeling and forecasting. Males are more sensitive than females to the number of intermediate stations because of the potentially increased uncertainty in waiting time related to the intermediate stations. The heterogenous frailties resulting from the heterogeneity of the perceptible service quality in terms of convenience and efficiency in subscribing/returning tickets and information availability in the progress of the CB system significantly contribute to user loyalty deviations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据