4.6 Article

Patterns of Avian Influenza A (H5) and A (H9) virus infection in backyard, commercial broiler and layer chicken farms in Bangladesh

期刊

TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 137-151

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13657

关键词

antibody prevalence; H5; H9; HPAI; infection pattern; virus prevalence

资金

  1. BALZAC research programme 'Behavioural adaptations in live poultry trading and farming systems and zoonoses control in Bangladesh' [BB/L018993/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. Defence Science and Technology Laboratory
  4. Department for International Development
  5. Economic and Social Sciences Research Council
  6. Medical Research Council
  7. Natural Environment Research Council
  8. Australian Government through an Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
  9. BBSRC [BB/S011269/1, BB/L018993/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study in Bangladesh examined the infection patterns of H5N1 and H9N2 avian influenza viruses in different chicken farming systems. While H5 antibodies were detected in unvaccinated birds in all farming systems, H5 and H9 virus circulation was found to be low among healthy chickens. The results can inform risk-based surveillance and mathematical models to understand the dynamics of HPAI infection in poultry.
In order to control Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) H5N1 and Low Pathogenic Avian Influenza (LPAI) H9N2 virus spread in endemically infected countries, a detailed understanding of infection patterns is required. We conducted cross-sectional studies in Bangladesh in 2016 and 2017, on 144 backyard, 106 broiler and 113 layer chicken farms. Although all sampled birds were negative for H5 virus by RT-PCR, H5 antibodies were detected in unvaccinated birds on all three farming systems. Higher H5 antibody prevalence was observed in ducks raised on backyard farms, 14.2% (95% CI: 10.0%-19.8%), compared to in-contact backyard chickens, 4.2% (95% CI: 2.8%-6.1%). The H5 antibody prevalence was lower in broiler chickens, 1.5% (95% CI: 0.9%-2.5%), compared to layer chickens, 7.8% (95% CI: 6.1%-9.8%). H9 viruses were detected by RT-PCR in 0.5% (95% CI: 0.2%-1.3%) and 0.6% (95% CI: 0.3%-1.5%) of broilers and layers, respectively, and in 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-1.2%) of backyard chickens. Backyard chickens and ducks showed similar H9 antibody prevalence, 16.0% (95% CI: 13.2%-19.2%) and 15.7% (95% CI: 11.3%-21.4%), which was higher compared to layers, 5.8% (95% CI: 4.3%-7.6%), and broilers, 1.5% (95% CI: 0.9%-2.5%). Over the course of a production cycle, H5 and H9 antibody prevalence increased with the age of backyard and layer chickens. Usually, multiple ducks within a flock were H5 antibody positive, in contrast to backyard chickens, broilers and layers where only individual birds within flocks developed H5 antibodies. Our findings highlight low virus circulation in healthy chickens of all production systems in Bangladesh, which is in contrast to high virus circulation reported from live bird markets. Data generated in this project can be used to adopt risk-based surveillance approaches in different chicken production systems in Bangladesh and to inform mathematical models exploring HPAI infection dynamics in poultry from the source of production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据