4.6 Article

Effect of quercetin loaded liposomes or nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) on post-thawed sperm quality and fertility of rooster sperm

期刊

THERIOGENOLOGY
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 122-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.04.033

关键词

Fertility; Nanoparticles; Sperm; Cryopreservation; Quercetin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 10, 15 and 20 mu M quercetin, alone or loaded in nanoliposomes or in nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) on sperm rooster cryopreservation and fertility performance. Sperm motility, viability, abnormalities, membrane integrity, mitochondrial activity, apoptosis status, lipid peroxidation (LP), GPX, SOD, TAC and fertility and hatchability rate were investigated after freeze-thawing. A significantly higher percentage (P < 0.05) of sperm total motility was obtained in sperm cryopreserved with 15 mu M quercetin loaded NLC compared to diluent with 10 and 20 mu M quercetin and to 10, 15 and 20 mu M quercetin loaded nanoliposomes, 20 mu M quercetin loaded NLC and control group. Also, 15 mu M quercetin loaded NLC was significantly higher in progressive motility, VSL, VAP and VCL parameters compared to control group. The percentage of viability, membrane integrity, mitochondria activity, TAC, and GPx increased in semen exposed to 15 mu M quercetin loaded NLC group. Likewise, the lowest level (P < 0.05) of malondialdehyde (MDA) was acquired in samples treated with 15 mu M quercetin and quercetin loaded NLC group in comparison to the control group. Abnormal form, SOD, and early apoptosis were not (P > 0.05) affected by different levels of quercetin. Fertility and hatchability rate showed higher levels in 15 mu M quercetin and quercetin loaded NLC group compared with control group. In conclusion, it seems that quercetin loaded NLC enhanced the antioxidant effect of quercetin by improving post-thawed sperm quality and fertility of rooster sperm. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据