4.6 Article

Paleomagnetism of the Late Cretaceous Red Beds From the Far Western Lhasa Terrane: Inclination Discrepancy and Tectonic Implications

期刊

TECTONICS
卷 39, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2020TC006280

关键词

Paleomagnetism; Late Cretaceous; Lhasa terrane; Inclination discrepancy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41572205, 41830215]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2652019198, 2652019199]
  3. Chinese 111 Project [B20011]
  4. NSFC [41888101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The precollisional locations and geometries of the Lhasa terrane (LT) are critical to constrain the India-Asia collision. However, the inclinations of the Cretaceous paleomagnetic data obtained from the northern limb of folds are obviously lower than those obtained from the southern limb, which cause large discrepant paleolatitudes of the LT prior to India-Asia collision. Here, we carried out a new paleomagnetic investigation on the Late Cretaceous Jingzhushan Formation red beds in the far western LT. The tilt-corrected site mean direction yielded a palaeopole at 74.4 degrees N, 226.0 degrees E with A(95) = 3.8 degrees (N = 54). This paleomagnetic data set passes fold tests and indicates that the studied area was located at 19.6 degrees +/- 3.8 degrees N during the Late Cretaceous. However, the mean inclination calculated from the northern limb of folds (I-s = 19.0 degrees) is significantly lower than that of the southern limb of folds (I-s = 51.8 degrees). This inclination discrepancy of the Jingzhushan Formation red beds may be attributed to the syntectonic sedimentation. Nevertheless, the site mean direction obtained from both limbs of folds is generally consistent with the site mean direction after syntectonic-sedimentation correction. Our new paleomagnetic results, combined with the reliable Cretaceous paleomagnetic results from the LT showed that the southern margin of Asia had a present-day relatively east-west alignment prior to India-Asia collision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据