4.7 Article

Magnetic N-doped 3D graphene-like framework carbon for extraction of cephalexin monohydrate and ceftiofur hydrochloride

期刊

TALANTA
卷 215, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120932

关键词

Magnetic solid-phase extraction; 3D carbon; Polyethyleneimine; Graphene-like carbon; Cephalosporin antibiotics; Biological sample

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575149, 21575148]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic N-doped 3D graphene-like framework carbon (Fe3O4@N-3DFC) was prepared via direct pyrolysis of sodium citrate and further hydrothermal reaction, and employed in the extraction of two cephalosporin antibiotics including cephalexin monohydrate and ceftiofur hydrochloride. The scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectrometry, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction were employed to confirm the successful synthesis of 3DFC-based adsorbents (3DFCs) including 3DFC, Fe3O4@3DFC and Fe3O4@N-3DFC. Fe3O4@N-3DFC sorbent with 3D graphene-like honeycomb architecture combined magnetic and N doping shows the attractive features including graphene carbon sheets, hierarchical porous structure, good wettability and higher surface affinity for cephalosporin antibiotics. Furthermore, the comparison of extraction efficiency with raw 3DFC and Fe3O4@3DFC sorbent also confirmed the superiority of Fe3O4@3DFC sorbent. Under optimized conditions, good linearity lines were obtained with the determination coefficients from 0.9953 to 0.9995. The limit of detections were in the range of 0.20-0.45 mu g L-1 and 0.03-0.10 pg L-1 for cephalexin and ceftiofur, respectively. The spiked extraction recoveries were between 81.59% and 98.35% with the relative standard deviation values less than 6.98%. Combined with high performance liquid chromatography, Fe3O4@3DFC based magnetic solid-phase extraction was successfully applied in river water and zebrafish samples analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据