4.7 Article

Effect of surfactant coating of Fe3O4 nanoparticles on magnetic dispersive micro-solid phase extraction of tetracyclines from human serum

期刊

TALANTA
卷 214, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120861

关键词

Surfactant-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles; Magnetic dispersive micro-solid phase extraction; HPLC-DAD; Tetracyclines; Human serum

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-3320004]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [18-03-01066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A procedure for separation and preconcentration of tetracyclines from human serum samples involving magnetic dispersive micro-solid phase extraction was proposed. The extraction efficiency of different tetracyclines was improved with the use of the surfactant coated Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles. Sorption mechanism was presented, and the potential use of magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles coated with different surfactants for tetracyclines adsorption was demonstrated for the first time. The procedure involved nanoparticle floating in a liquid sample phase for analyte extraction followed by elution and determination by high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection. Influence of the main involved parameters was studied, the system was dimensioned accordingly. The analytical curves were linear in the ranges of 0.25-10 mg L-1 for tetracycline and 0.10-10 mg L-1 for oxytetracycline or doxycycline. Limits of detection were estimated (IUPAC, 3 concept) as 0.08 mg L-1 for tetracycline, and 0.03 mg L-1 for oxytetracycline or doxycycline. The proposed procedure proved to be fast (10 min), simple (two stages), inexpensive (10 mg of nanoparticles) and was applied to human serum samples. Unlike previously synthesized nanoparticles for tetracyclines separation, the surfactant-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles can be easily prepared with widely available and low-cost reagents. Moreover, elution of the analytes was accomplished in absence of organic solvents by an aqueous chelating agent solution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据