4.5 Review

A systematic review of the evidence on home care reablement services

期刊

CLINICAL REHABILITATION
卷 30, 期 8, 页码 741-749

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0269215515603220

关键词

Reablement; older people; personal care services; multimorbidity; disability; independence; systematic review; randomized controlled trial; non-randomized controlled trial; public policy

资金

  1. Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether publically funded reablement services' have any effect on patient health or use of services. Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies in which reablement interventions were compared with no care or usual care in people referred to public-funded personal care services. Data sources included: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EPOC register of studies, trials registers, Medline, EMBASE, and CINHAL. Searches were from 2000 up to end February 2015. Setting: Not applicable. Participants: Investigators' definition of the target population for reablement interventions. Main outcome measures: Use of publically funded personal care services and dependence in personal activities of daily living. Results: We found no studies fulfilling our inclusion criteria that assessed the effectiveness of reablement interventions. We did note the lack of an agreed understanding of the nature of reablement. Conclusions: Reablement is an ill-defined intervention targeted towards an ill-defined and potentially highly heterogeneous population/patient group. There is no evidence to suggest it is effective at either of its goals; increasing personal independence or reducing use of personal care services.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据