4.7 Article

Country-scale InSAR monitoring for settlement and uplift damage calculation in architectural heritage structures

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1475921720942120

关键词

Structural monitoring; differential settlement; damage assessment; data analysis; InSAR; remote sensing

资金

  1. BRAIN.be
  2. BelSPO [BR/132/A6/Gepatar]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article introduces a methodology for assessing building damage using InSAR data and demonstrates its application on the cultural heritage inventory of Belgium to evaluate settlement and uplift damage over the years.
The article proposes a methodology for assessing the development of damage in building structures, subjected to differential settlement and uplift, using the analysis of Interferometry Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) data. The proposed methodology is targeted towards general applicability, capable of providing assessment results for measurements over wide geographic areas and for varying structural typologies. The methodology is not limited to ground movement measurements linked to tunnelling, as is the common case. Instead it extends to the monitoring of arbitrary movement in buildings, for example, due to ground consolidation, water table changes or excavation. The methodology is designed for use alongside patrimonial building databases, from which data on individual building geometry and typology are extracted on a region or country scale. Ground movement monitoring data are used for the calculation of the building deformation, expressed in different types of deformation parameters. The combined use of this data with analytical models for settlement damage classification in building structures enables the assessment in patrimonial building structures, at a country scale. The methodology is elaborated and applied on the patrimonial inventory of Belgium for the evaluation of potential settlement and uplift damage on buildings over a period of nearly three decades. The analysis results are compared to on-site observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据