4.3 Article

Behavior and design of reinforced concrete frames retrofitted with steel bracing against progressive collapse

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/tal.1771

关键词

fragility analysis; incremental dynamic analysis; progressive collapse; reinforced concrete frame; retrofitting design; steel braces

资金

  1. Open Foundation of Engineering Research Center of Construction Technology of Precast Concrete of Zhejiang Province
  2. Qinglan Project
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019B12814]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20180073]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51408189, 51978246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Steel bracing is able to improve progressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete (RC) frames, but the bracing design is typically based on seismic retrofitting or lateral stability. There is no approach for design of steel bracing against progressive collapse. To this end, a retrofitting approach with steel braces is proposed based on analysis of macro finite element (FE) models with fiber beam elements. The FE models were initially validated through the experimental results of a braced frame and then used to investigate the effects of pertinent parameters on the progressive collapse resistance of planar frames. The results suggest the braces should be placed at the top story. Thereafter, macro FE models are built to investigate the dynamic responses of the three-dimensional prototype RC frames under different column removal scenarios (CRS) and show the necessity of retrofitting. Accordingly, the design approach of steel bracing is proposed with incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) and assuming independent contribution of braces and frames to resistance. Finally, the fragility analysis of the frames under a corner-penultimate-exterior CRS is conducted through IDA and Monte Carlo simulation, and the results confirm the validity of the proposed design approach for retrofitting RC frames.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据